|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Jul 2012, 10:15 (Ref:3112012) | #426 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 61
|
only the 2012 458 has a big fuel economy advantage, the 2011 model used in gt-am has average consumes.
|
||
|
27 Jul 2012, 10:18 (Ref:3112013) | #427 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
I never said discourage it but why focus on it in GTE to the detriment of the racing?
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
27 Jul 2012, 10:23 (Ref:3112017) | #428 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 278
|
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 10:30 (Ref:3112020) | #429 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 10:40 (Ref:3112024) | #430 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
It's what P1 is doing, pushing the fuel efficiency to the absolute limit, leave it for them.
How would it lessen the racing? Corvettes and Vipers big engines would (and do) use more fuel than the smaller displacement Ferrari and Porsche engines, that's not something I want to see change. In an effort to push fuel economy drivers wouldn't be able to push so hard, how many races have we seen where drivers battling hard have made the racing awesome? HEAPS! Economy drives in GTE would dull the racing completely...like I said, P1 is for the advancement of technology and there's no reason for GTE to look into it but it shouldn't be written into the rules. |
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
27 Jul 2012, 10:57 (Ref:3112034) | #431 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
How would you suggest Engines to be balanced without leaving the huge torque advantage of High volume engines... As the current system is clearly broken....The apparent closeness of racing is only virtualy upheld by ALMS artificialy created last lap fights trough safty cars... This becomes apperant on ELMS, and WEC (non ALMS) races.... constant readjustment of BoP is idiotic, and 99% of the racing performance is sandbagged... maybe the best way would be to run the engines unrestricted with 80l fuel tanks..sure the 7-8l would be faster, but would go to pits every other lap |
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 10:59 (Ref:3112038) | #432 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
If they are to use that formula for the GT class, maybe they have to allow for pure racing engines. The current crop of cars eligiable for GTE don't cut it. |
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:04 (Ref:3112039) | #433 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:04 (Ref:3112040) | #434 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
The system as it is now, and as you propose rewords inefficiency, and plain old aincent technology of te high volume gas guslers...
that is just not right, GT racing should reflect roads cars even closer then LMP1 do...and low efficient engines should be penalised or at least their addvantige removed... The viper is total ALMS BS, and I hope ACO trows it out on it's ass..(but that aint gonna happen)... the 4-5.5l engines we have now are just at the limit where it is possible to balance them out...with posible 25kg per 500cc of volume increse..to take out the torque addvantige, and add a sence of realism, as larger engines are heavier... |
||
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:07 (Ref:3112042) | #435 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Push as they like, i.e "don't push, we'll run out of fuel before the end of the race"
Lol! on the second point. As it stands the current balancing between the cars is as close as it has ever been bar Porsche being a bit slower on the straights. How many last lap battles because of safety cars has there been in the ALMS this year alone? Yes, I thought so.... Broken record, Arakis and BoP, these go hand in hand very very well. Like the RLM crew say, what needs to change with GTE? NOTHING! Whilst I would like to see Corvette get to use the LS7 and race a GTE Z06 (I'm a Z06 man, I am warming to the ZR1 however) and Aston race with a V12 I'm not going to sit in the corner and cry if it never happens. Quote:
|
|||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
27 Jul 2012, 11:16 (Ref:3112050) | #436 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
There's a lot that needs to be changed... EVEN mr Hindhaugh has changed his opinion on this and has said that the phrase you just said no longer really works, take a listen to the Midweek Motorsport episode 26 and you can hear John's dislike towards the growing use of waivers and balance of performance in the category
|
|
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:20 (Ref:3112055) | #437 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:25 (Ref:3112058) | #438 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
NASCRAP isn't even cheap thrills!
Yeah the BoP and waivers do get excessive at times and there should be a BoP freeze after May-ish but I doubt we'll see anything like it with the current muppets in charge... |
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
27 Jul 2012, 11:26 (Ref:3112059) | #439 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
What do you mean, I for once would love to see Aaron's Lucky Dog, green white checkers, competition cautions and tube frames introduced
Not but seriously, I generally do tend to agree with most (well, some) of arakis's points, however the US style of throwing safety cars in every time someone spins in is not any less artificial than the 3x SC rule in Europe which always puts someone 1 lap down, whether they deserved it or not - and everyone is screwed on restarts. Also the insurance etc is different on the other side of the pond |
|
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:39 (Ref:3112070) | #440 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:53 (Ref:3112083) | #441 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 430
|
||
|
27 Jul 2012, 11:55 (Ref:3112085) | #442 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 430
|
||
|
27 Jul 2012, 12:21 (Ref:3112094) | #443 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 430
|
Quote:
http://www.aquilaracingcars.com/prod...t/cr1-ls7.aspx http://www.aquilaracingcars.com/prod...r1-bmw-m3.aspx http://www.aquilaracingcars.com/prod...1-bmw-m60.aspx More power, more torque from an engine package of about the same size. Of course you want to kill displacement size; it’s the only chance your weenie pony has. I think they should open the rules more for displacement on demand as long as the road car has it. Current rule package kills any real innovation. |
||
|
27 Jul 2012, 13:15 (Ref:3112114) | #444 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
Personally I couldn't care less, as under the current rules it's clear that the 458 is the best race car out there... which is enough of a satisfaction for me. I only wish Ferrari and Michelotto's efforts get reworded with victories instead of being punished because the others just can't develop fast enough to follow them. Personally I'm satisfied with just the Le Mans victory, and the overall acknowledgment that 458 is the superior race cars..I wan't the wins for Ferrari and Michelotto so they continue to develop, and not get fed up with FIA/ACO and show them the finger and leave On another note, I advocate that the GTE class be for sports cars. and I fint the corvette zr1 an excelent sports car, as well as the Viper, and the mcLaren, I don't want them to go, I don't however wanna see Sedans, and hairstylists cars included (M3s, and Z4s), let them enjoy GT3/4, GTE should be for the big boys, with cars that actually come close to each other on the road as well as the race track. |
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 13:20 (Ref:3112115) | #445 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Corvette other than fuel consumption seemed to have the Ferrari beaten at all races they've competed against each other in the past 2 years nearly. Luckily luck wasn't on Corvette's side this year at Le Mans so the silly pony got a victory. But hey, milk it for all it's worth Arakis because it won't be another Ferrari win next year
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
27 Jul 2012, 13:28 (Ref:3112122) | #446 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
disputing that is childish, as pretty much every team is saying that, along with how poor the BoP has treated them |
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 13:29 (Ref:3112126) | #447 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,326
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
27 Jul 2012, 13:32 (Ref:3112130) | #448 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
|||
|
27 Jul 2012, 13:33 (Ref:3112131) | #449 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
LOL! Arakis you're not a Ferrari employee are you? because that's A grade Ferrari arrogance right there!
They never raced the 7.0L in GT2, only the 6.0L (which had DI that Ferrari *****ed about and so they were forced to remove) then the 5.5L. |
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
27 Jul 2012, 13:33 (Ref:3112132) | #450 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,326
|
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24 Race] Which GTE V8 sounded the best? | vincegail | 24 Heures du Mans | 15 | 13 Jun 2016 14:41 |
Lexus LFA GTE | BanjoMaster | Sportscar & GT Racing | 7 | 10 Feb 2012 11:21 |
end of GTE/GT2 classs? | arakis | Sportscar & GT Racing | 23 | 25 Jul 2011 02:34 |
Sebring GTE-Pro Coverage | arakis | North American Racing | 13 | 23 Mar 2011 00:49 |
GTE speed limiter | gucom | Sportscar & GT Racing | 19 | 11 Aug 2010 02:41 |