Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 Jul 2012, 10:15 (Ref:3112012)   #426
busdegnao
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Switzerland
Lugano
Posts: 61
busdegnao should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
only the 2012 458 has a big fuel economy advantage, the 2011 model used in gt-am has average consumes.
busdegnao is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 10:18 (Ref:3112013)   #427
MitchZ06
Veteran
 
MitchZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
New Zealand
Australia
Posts: 2,261
MitchZ06 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I never said discourage it but why focus on it in GTE to the detriment of the racing?
MitchZ06 is offline  
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 10:23 (Ref:3112017)   #428
Mt. Lynx
Racer
 
Mt. Lynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Sweden
Stockholm
Posts: 278
Mt. Lynx should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by arakis View Post
hope so
Then they really need to rethink the enginerules.
Mt. Lynx is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 10:30 (Ref:3112020)   #429
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchZ06 View Post
I never said discourage it but why focus on it in GTE to the detriment of the racing?
in what way would it lessen the racing?
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 10:40 (Ref:3112024)   #430
MitchZ06
Veteran
 
MitchZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
New Zealand
Australia
Posts: 2,261
MitchZ06 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It's what P1 is doing, pushing the fuel efficiency to the absolute limit, leave it for them.

How would it lessen the racing? Corvettes and Vipers big engines would (and do) use more fuel than the smaller displacement Ferrari and Porsche engines, that's not something I want to see change. In an effort to push fuel economy drivers wouldn't be able to push so hard, how many races have we seen where drivers battling hard have made the racing awesome? HEAPS! Economy drives in GTE would dull the racing completely...like I said, P1 is for the advancement of technology and there's no reason for GTE to look into it but it shouldn't be written into the rules.
MitchZ06 is offline  
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 10:57 (Ref:3112034)   #431
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchZ06 View Post
It's what P1 is doing, pushing the fuel efficiency to the absolute limit, leave it for them.

How would it lessen the racing? Corvettes and Vipers big engines would (and do) use more fuel than the smaller displacement Ferrari and Porsche engines, that's not something I want to see change. In an effort to push fuel economy drivers wouldn't be able to push so hard, how many races have we seen where drivers battling hard have made the racing awesome? HEAPS! Economy drives in GTE would dull the racing completely...like I said, P1 is for the advancement of technology and there's no reason for GTE to look into it but it shouldn't be written into the rules.
I disagree, with proper engine mods / maps the drivers could push as they like..

How would you suggest Engines to be balanced without leaving the huge torque advantage of High volume engines... As the current system is clearly broken....The apparent closeness of racing is only virtualy upheld by ALMS artificialy created last lap fights trough safty cars... This becomes apperant on ELMS, and WEC (non ALMS) races....

constant readjustment of BoP is idiotic, and 99% of the racing performance is sandbagged...

maybe the best way would be to run the engines unrestricted with 80l fuel tanks..sure the 7-8l would be faster, but would go to pits every other lap
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 10:59 (Ref:3112038)   #432
Mt. Lynx
Racer
 
Mt. Lynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Sweden
Stockholm
Posts: 278
Mt. Lynx should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchZ06 View Post
It's what P1 is doing, pushing the fuel efficiency to the absolute limit, leave it for them.

How would it lessen the racing? Corvettes and Vipers big engines would (and do) use more fuel than the smaller displacement Ferrari and Porsche engines, that's not something I want to see change. In an effort to push fuel economy drivers wouldn't be able to push so hard, how many races have we seen where drivers battling hard have made the racing awesome? HEAPS! Economy drives in GTE would dull the racing completely...like I said, P1 is for the advancement of technology and there's no reason for GTE to look into it but it shouldn't be written into the rules.
I agree to this.
If they are to use that formula for the GT class, maybe they have to allow for pure racing engines. The current crop of cars eligiable for GTE don't cut it.
Mt. Lynx is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:04 (Ref:3112039)   #433
The Badger
Veteran
 
The Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Innsbruck , Austria
Posts: 13,763
The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchZ06 View Post
GTE has never been about fuel economy...
Endurance racing is always about fuel economy ..... affects the number and length of pit stops .
The Badger is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:04 (Ref:3112040)   #434
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
The system as it is now, and as you propose rewords inefficiency, and plain old aincent technology of te high volume gas guslers...
that is just not right, GT racing should reflect roads cars even closer then LMP1 do...and low efficient engines should be penalised or at least their addvantige removed...

The viper is total ALMS BS, and I hope ACO trows it out on it's ass..(but that aint gonna happen)...

the 4-5.5l engines we have now are just at the limit where it is possible to balance them out...with posible 25kg per 500cc of volume increse..to take out the torque addvantige, and add a sence of realism, as larger engines are heavier...
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:07 (Ref:3112042)   #435
MitchZ06
Veteran
 
MitchZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
New Zealand
Australia
Posts: 2,261
MitchZ06 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Push as they like, i.e "don't push, we'll run out of fuel before the end of the race"

Lol! on the second point. As it stands the current balancing between the cars is as close as it has ever been bar Porsche being a bit slower on the straights. How many last lap battles because of safety cars has there been in the ALMS this year alone? Yes, I thought so....

Broken record, Arakis and BoP, these go hand in hand very very well.

Like the RLM crew say, what needs to change with GTE? NOTHING!
Whilst I would like to see Corvette get to use the LS7 and race a GTE Z06 (I'm a Z06 man, I am warming to the ZR1 however) and Aston race with a V12 I'm not going to sit in the corner and cry if it never happens.



Quote:
Originally Posted by arakis View Post
I disagree, with proper engine mods / maps the drivers could push as they like..

How would you suggest Engines to be balanced without leaving the huge torque advantage of High volume engines... As the current system is clearly broken....The apparent closeness of racing is only virtualy upheld by ALMS artificialy created last lap fights trough safty cars... This becomes apperant on ELMS, and WEC (non ALMS) races....

constant readjustment of BoP is idiotic, and 99% of the racing performance is sandbagged...

maybe the best way would be to run the engines unrestricted with 80l fuel tanks..sure the 7-8l would be faster, but would go to pits every other lap
MitchZ06 is offline  
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:16 (Ref:3112050)   #436
Deleted
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
Deleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchZ06 View Post
Like the RLM crew say, what needs to change with GTE? NOTHING!
There's a lot that needs to be changed... EVEN mr Hindhaugh has changed his opinion on this and has said that the phrase you just said no longer really works, take a listen to the Midweek Motorsport episode 26 and you can hear John's dislike towards the growing use of waivers and balance of performance in the category
Deleted is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:20 (Ref:3112055)   #437
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiana View Post
There's a lot that needs to be changed... EVEN mr Hindhaugh has changed his opinion on this and has said that the phrase you just said no longer really works, take a listen to the Midweek Motorsport episode 26 and you can hear John's dislike towards the growing use of waivers and balance of performance in the category
mah leave him alone, he'd just like to see GTE turened into Nascar's cheap thrills
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:25 (Ref:3112058)   #438
MitchZ06
Veteran
 
MitchZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
New Zealand
Australia
Posts: 2,261
MitchZ06 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
NASCRAP isn't even cheap thrills!

Yeah the BoP and waivers do get excessive at times and there should be a BoP freeze after May-ish but I doubt we'll see anything like it with the current muppets in charge...
MitchZ06 is offline  
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:26 (Ref:3112059)   #439
Deleted
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
Deleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
What do you mean, I for once would love to see Aaron's Lucky Dog, green white checkers, competition cautions and tube frames introduced

Not but seriously, I generally do tend to agree with most (well, some) of arakis's points, however the US style of throwing safety cars in every time someone spins in is not any less artificial than the 3x SC rule in Europe which always puts someone 1 lap down, whether they deserved it or not - and everyone is screwed on restarts. Also the insurance etc is different on the other side of the pond
Deleted is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:39 (Ref:3112070)   #440
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiana View Post
What do you mean, I for once would love to see Aaron's Lucky Dog, green white checkers, competition cautions and tube frames introduced

Not but seriously, I generally do tend to agree with most (well, some) of arakis's points, however the US style of throwing safety cars in every time someone spins in is not any less artificial than the 3x SC rule in Europe which always puts someone 1 lap down, whether they deserved it or not - and everyone is screwed on restarts. Also the insurance etc is different on the other side of the pond
agree on that as well..IMO SC should be outlawed and stewart controlled pit limiter button should be installed...
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:53 (Ref:3112083)   #441
kyoung
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2010
United States
Posts: 430
kyoung should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridkyoung should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by FstrthnU View Post
*cough* I think you mean maximum displacement
No I meant minimum, just left out the sarcasm tags.
kyoung is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 11:55 (Ref:3112085)   #442
kyoung
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2010
United States
Posts: 430
kyoung should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridkyoung should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeb View Post
Because they want to run the engines that are in the cars they sell. Makes sense to me - allow production engines in the production class.
BINGO!, give this man a cigar.
kyoung is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 12:21 (Ref:3112094)   #443
kyoung
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2010
United States
Posts: 430
kyoung should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridkyoung should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by arakis View Post
The system as it is now, and as you propose rewords inefficiency, and plain old aincent technology of te high volume gas guslers...
that is just not right, GT racing should reflect roads cars even closer then LMP1 do...and low efficient engines should be penalised or at least their addvantige removed...

The viper is total ALMS BS, and I hope ACO trows it out on it's ass..(but that aint gonna happen)...

the 4-5.5l engines we have now are just at the limit where it is possible to balance them out...with posible 25kg per 500cc of volume increse..to take out the torque addvantige, and add a sence of realism, as larger engines are heavier...
You don’t know what you are talking about; check the engine spec to the right on these pages...

http://www.aquilaracingcars.com/prod...t/cr1-ls7.aspx

http://www.aquilaracingcars.com/prod...r1-bmw-m3.aspx

http://www.aquilaracingcars.com/prod...1-bmw-m60.aspx

More power, more torque from an engine package of about the same size. Of course you want to kill displacement size; it’s the only chance your weenie pony has. I think they should open the rules more for displacement on demand as long as the road car has it. Current rule package kills any real innovation.
kyoung is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 13:15 (Ref:3112114)   #444
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyoung View Post
Of course you want to kill displacement size; it’s the only chance your weenie pony has. I think they should open the rules more for displacement on demand as long as the road car has it. Current rule package kills any real innovation.
Actually even with the torque advantage, the corvette is no match for the 458 (if the corvette wasn't BoP-ed)

Personally I couldn't care less, as under the current rules it's clear that the 458 is the best race car out there... which is enough of a satisfaction for me. I only wish Ferrari and Michelotto's efforts get reworded with victories instead of being punished because the others just can't develop fast enough to follow them.

Personally I'm satisfied with just the Le Mans victory, and the overall acknowledgment that 458 is the superior race cars..I wan't the wins for Ferrari and Michelotto so they continue to develop, and not get fed up with FIA/ACO and show them the finger and leave

On another note, I advocate that the GTE class be for sports cars. and I fint the corvette zr1 an excelent sports car, as well as the Viper, and the mcLaren, I don't want them to go, I don't however wanna see Sedans, and hairstylists cars included (M3s, and Z4s), let them enjoy GT3/4, GTE should be for the big boys, with cars that actually come close to each other on the road as well as the race track.
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 13:20 (Ref:3112115)   #445
MitchZ06
Veteran
 
MitchZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
New Zealand
Australia
Posts: 2,261
MitchZ06 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Corvette other than fuel consumption seemed to have the Ferrari beaten at all races they've competed against each other in the past 2 years nearly. Luckily luck wasn't on Corvette's side this year at Le Mans so the silly pony got a victory. But hey, milk it for all it's worth Arakis because it won't be another Ferrari win next year
MitchZ06 is offline  
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 13:28 (Ref:3112122)   #446
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchZ06 View Post
Corvette other than fuel consumption seemed to have the Ferrari beaten at all races they've competed against each other in the past 2 years nearly. Luckily luck wasn't on Corvette's side this year at Le Mans so the silly pony got a victory. But hey, milk it for all it's worth Arakis because it won't be another Ferrari win next year
you trow away the restrictor handout the corvette has, and all the other BoP bull-crap it received, and your left with a pretty crappy race car compared to Ferrari... IOW standing side by side without any BoP Ferrari would win every race hands down, against any GTE car. meaning Ferrari built the best race car, in any and every way a race car can be measured, the rest is FIA/ACO BS.....


disputing that is childish, as pretty much every team is saying that, along with how poor the BoP has treated them
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 13:29 (Ref:3112126)   #447
Speed-King
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Wuerzburg,Germany
Posts: 7,326
Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by arakis View Post
you trow away the restrictor handout the corvette has, and all the other BoP bull-crap it received, and your left with a pretty crappy race car compared to Ferrari... IOW standing side by side without any BoP Ferrari would win every race hands down, against any GTE car. meaning Ferrari built the best race car, the rest is FIA/ACO BS.....
Well, give the Corvette the 7l engine back and it might look different.
Speed-King is offline  
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam.
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 13:32 (Ref:3112130)   #448
arakis
Veteran
 
arakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Serbia
Belgrade,Serbia
Posts: 2,900
arakis has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed-King View Post
Well, give the Corvette the 7l engine back and it might look different.
doupt it, as they were slowpokes when they started with it
arakis is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 13:33 (Ref:3112131)   #449
MitchZ06
Veteran
 
MitchZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
New Zealand
Australia
Posts: 2,261
MitchZ06 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
LOL! Arakis you're not a Ferrari employee are you? because that's A grade Ferrari arrogance right there!

They never raced the 7.0L in GT2, only the 6.0L (which had DI that Ferrari *****ed about and so they were forced to remove) then the 5.5L.
MitchZ06 is offline  
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2012, 13:33 (Ref:3112132)   #450
Speed-King
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Wuerzburg,Germany
Posts: 7,326
Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by arakis View Post
doupt it, as they were slowpokes when they started with it
Back then they were new to the category and restricted to hell and back. I thought we were talking about a straight up fight without any restrictors.
Speed-King is offline  
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam.
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[LM24 Race] Which GTE V8 sounded the best? vincegail 24 Heures du Mans 15 13 Jun 2016 14:41
Lexus LFA GTE BanjoMaster Sportscar & GT Racing 7 10 Feb 2012 11:21
end of GTE/GT2 classs? arakis Sportscar & GT Racing 23 25 Jul 2011 02:34
Sebring GTE-Pro Coverage arakis North American Racing 13 23 Mar 2011 00:49
GTE speed limiter gucom Sportscar & GT Racing 19 11 Aug 2010 02:41


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.